
Untested isn't an eBay condition. A seller who writes it has still picked a label from eBay's list, almost always Used, which implies a fully working item, or For parts or not working, which promises nothing. Your protection gets measured against that field and the description together, so read the field first.
They're ordered cheapest first, and the first four cost nothing but attention: no messages, no waiting, no leaving the listing. Run those before you spend real time on anything, and reaching number twelve should be rare.
Everything except eight, nine and twelve is already on the page in front of you. Those three cost real time, and by then you're already interested.
Two labels carry the weight for used goods. Used implies an item that has been owned before and is fully operational. For parts or not working sets the opposite expectation: the seller is telling you it may not do the thing it was built to do.
That's a large gap, and the seller chose which side of it to stand on.
Both labels are defined on eBay's item conditions page. The seller picks that field off a fixed list and doesn't type it in, which is what makes it worth more than anything else written on the page.
Two qualifications before you lean on this too hard. The labels available differ by category, and eBay's page lists them that way instead of as one universal set, so read the field on the listing and don't assume the set you saw last time. And the label is the seller's own pick. It isn't a verdict from eBay.
| What you're reading | Where it lives | What it commits the seller to |
|---|---|---|
| Used | eBay's condition field, chosen from a list | An item that has been used and is fully operational |
| For parts or not working | eBay's condition field, chosen from a list | No promise that it works at all |
| Untested | The description, typed by the seller | Nothing eBay defines. The condition field is still the field |
| As-is | The description, typed by the seller | Nothing eBay defines. The condition field is still the field |
The bottom two rows are where most disappointment lives. The next two sections take them one at a time.
No. Untested appears nowhere in eBay's condition taxonomy. It isn't a label a seller can pick, which means a seller who writes it in the description has already picked something else from the list above it, and on used goods that something else is almost always either Used or For parts or not working.
That's a fact about eBay's fields, not an opinion about sellers.
The reason to care is that your protection is measured against the listing. eBay's Money Back Guarantee covers an item that doesn't match what the listing said, and the condition field is part of what the listing said. We wrote up the guarantee separately, including the window it runs on and the one mistake that puts you outside it.
Here's the one thing this post can't settle for you. We couldn't find an eBay-hosted page that says which one wins when the condition field and the description disagree, so we're not going to tell you that the field beats the description, or the reverse. The disagreement itself is the risk, and you found it before you paid.
Untested does more work in electronics than in any other category, because so many faults are invisible in a photograph. The used electronics guide covers what to ask for and which eras to be suspicious of.
No. As-is is seller shorthand. It isn't an eBay field, it has no definition on eBay's condition page, and writing it doesn't change the label the seller selected or remove the buyer protection attached to it.
What as-is signals is intent: this seller would rather not deal with a return. Useful information about the person, but not a term of the sale.
Two things do govern the return, and both are real fields on the listing:
Keep those two apart. Whether a seller will take something back voluntarily and whether the item matched the listing are different questions, and as-is only speaks to the first.
Ask the seller for one photo of the actual item with a piece of paper next to it showing today's date. A seller holding the thing can do that without thinking about it. A seller who isn't holding it stops answering, and the silence is the answer.
Before you send that message, four tells are usually enough:
One older piece of advice has stopped being enough on its own. A reverse image search exposes a stock photo by finding its source, which only works when the picture came from somewhere. Listings using generated images are documented and rising, and a generated image has no source to find. That's why the dated paper is the check that settles it.
Lot isn't an eBay field either. It's a word sellers put in titles, it has no fixed definition, and what it means changes by category. The trap isn't the word. The trap is that a listing offering more than one unit prices per unit, so the number your eye lands on isn't the number you're comparing against the photo. You can prove that on any multi-quantity listing by raising the quantity and watching the total move.
Check the quantity available first. Then read what lot is doing in that particular title, because the failure looks different in each category:
The general form is the same everywhere. A lot is priced as though you want all of it, and usually you want one or two things out of it. Price those on their own before the bundle starts looking like a discount.
Recent negatives and neutrals in the category you're buying, not the percentage at the top. The percentage is a ratio, and ratios hide the thing you need.
Do the arithmetic once and you'll stop reading it as a score:
The text is what's worth reading. Open the feedback, sort to the most recent, and look for three things:
Read the seller's replies too. Someone who argues with buyers in public will argue with you in private.
All of that happens before you compare the price to anything, because a good price on a listing that fails these checks isn't a good price. When you do reach the number, compare it against the other listings on the same page instead of against your memory. Working out whether an eBay price is good is its own problem, and the short version is that asking prices and sold prices are different numbers.
Our own search is one way to do that side of it. The results page compares every listing against the others that same search returned, then marks the ones sitting well below the rest of the page and the ones sitting well above it. It compares asking prices of active listings, never sold prices, because we hold no sold-price data, and it labels nothing at all under five comparable listings. Set the condition filter to Good or Better and the For parts listings drop out of what gets averaged. eBay US, free, no account needed to search.
None of that reads a description for you. Twelve checks, in order, and the first four are still the ones that save the money.
Nothing official. As-is is seller shorthand with no definition on eBay's condition pages, and it isn't a field on the listing at all. Writing it doesn't change the condition label the seller selected and doesn't remove eBay's buyer protection. What it does tell you is that this seller would rather not handle a return. The seller's own stated returns policy is the separate field that actually governs that.
No. Untested appears nowhere in eBay's condition taxonomy, so it isn't a label a seller can select. A seller using the word in a description has still picked something from eBay's list, and on used goods that's almost always Used, which implies a fully operational item, or For parts or not working, which sets the opposite expectation. Read the field, then read the word against it.
Yes, but only if the item doesn't match the listing. For parts or not working tells you up front that it may not function, so finding out that it doesn't isn't a mismatch. Undisclosed damage, a missing component the photos showed, or the wrong item entirely are different claims. The seller's own returns policy is separate and may allow a return anyway.
One request settles it. Ask the seller for a photo of the actual item next to a piece of paper showing today's date. Sellers holding the item send it. Sellers who aren't holding it go quiet, and the silence answers the question. Before you ask, look for studio lighting, a white background, a single image, and no wear at all on an item that's old enough to have some.
Run the same search here and you'll see every listing compared against the others that search returned, with the ones well below the rest of the page marked. The comparison reads asking prices of active listings, not sold prices, because we hold no sold data, and nothing is labeled at all under five comparable listings.
Search eBay listingsFree · eBay US only · No credit card